Interesting how his essay, "Machines of Loving Grace" [1], echoes Adam Curtis' "All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace" [2], which argues the exact opposite, namely that
> computers have failed to liberate humanity, and instead have "distorted and simplified our view of the world around us."
Likely this is strategic to harm competitors. I'm going to assume there is a significant number of AI models out there that are not only not open source, they are not even public.
>Speaking at a Council on Foreign Relations event on Monday, Amodei said that China is known for its “large-scale industrial espionage” and that AI companies like Anthropic are almost certainly being targeted.
> Jordan Schneider: We’ve talked about competition from the lens of compute, from the lens of models, but models are created by people. The times I’ve been to NeurIPS, it has been really striking to me just how much Mandarin is spoken at those poster sessions. I’m curious what message you’d have to say to PRC nationals studying in the West who hear this and are like, “Why would I want to work for this guy?"
> Dario Amodei: I want to be really clear on one thing — I should probably say it even more than I do. When we talk about China, this isn’t about Chinese people versus American people.
But we'll totally suspect you of being a spy for the PRC
> “Many of these algorithmic secrets, there are $100 million secrets that are a few lines of code"
I wonder how many western labs have not hesitated to implement techniques revealed openly by DeepSeek.
DeepSeek has open-sourced arguably more than 100M in value so far, from detailing their inference stack to discussing how they bypassed CUDA to use PTX[0] directly, or even open-sourcing an entire filesystem[1].
Yeah, you know that the company is struggling when they start making comments like this. Which anybody who has any technical knowledge will know to be utter fud.
What deepseek has done is so much better than anything else in the West that the panic hasn't left yet.
Interesting how his essay, "Machines of Loving Grace" [1], echoes Adam Curtis' "All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace" [2], which argues the exact opposite, namely that
> computers have failed to liberate humanity, and instead have "distorted and simplified our view of the world around us."
[1] https://darioamodei.com/machines-of-loving-grace
[2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Watched_Over_by_Machines...
I have a huge respect for Claude and their models, but this statement is just dump!
DeepSeek, and Alibaba (Qwen) are making their models open source including the papers explaining “their secrets”.
It is some sort of virtue signaling.
if only more companies virtue signaled like this!
I meant that the Anthrophic CEO is virtue sigaling. I would argue DeepSeek is actually virtuous.
Likely this is strategic to harm competitors. I'm going to assume there is a significant number of AI models out there that are not only not open source, they are not even public.
>Speaking at a Council on Foreign Relations event on Monday, Amodei said that China is known for its “large-scale industrial espionage” and that AI companies like Anthropic are almost certainly being targeted.
Also from https://www.chinatalk.media/p/anthropics-dario-amodei-on-ai-...
> Jordan Schneider: We’ve talked about competition from the lens of compute, from the lens of models, but models are created by people. The times I’ve been to NeurIPS, it has been really striking to me just how much Mandarin is spoken at those poster sessions. I’m curious what message you’d have to say to PRC nationals studying in the West who hear this and are like, “Why would I want to work for this guy?"
> Dario Amodei: I want to be really clear on one thing — I should probably say it even more than I do. When we talk about China, this isn’t about Chinese people versus American people.
But we'll totally suspect you of being a spy for the PRC
> “Many of these algorithmic secrets, there are $100 million secrets that are a few lines of code"
I wonder how many western labs have not hesitated to implement techniques revealed openly by DeepSeek.
DeepSeek has open-sourced arguably more than 100M in value so far, from detailing their inference stack to discussing how they bypassed CUDA to use PTX[0] directly, or even open-sourcing an entire filesystem[1].
[0] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42859909
[1] - https://x.com/suchenzang/status/1895437762427560236
> revealed openly
If it's revealed openly the it's not stealing. What's your point?
I doubt that a few lines of code are worth a hundred million , without all the infrastructure Anthropic built to operate its business.
They have no moat and want the government to build one.
Yeah, you know that the company is struggling when they start making comments like this. Which anybody who has any technical knowledge will know to be utter fud.
What deepseek has done is so much better than anything else in the West that the panic hasn't left yet.